Global Trends Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
No Result
View All Result
Global Trends Today
No Result
View All Result
Home Investing

In Search of Alternative Financing for Critical Minerals Projects

by
October 3, 2024
in Investing
0
In Search of Alternative Financing for Critical Minerals Projects
0
SHARES
0
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

Several critical minerals, in particular lithium and nickel, have been suffering from depressed prices for more than 12 months despite projections of ever-increasing demand, driven by Western governments’ energy transition goals.

Attracting finance into critical minerals projects is one of the key challenges standing in the way of diversifying existing supply chains, which are typically dominated by China, particularly in the midstream (processing and refining) and downstream (component and end-product manufacture) sectors. Like-minded nations are attempting to incentivise supply chain diversification to protect their domestic manufacturing sectors from unfair practices, via both policies aimed at onshoring and tariffs to minimise the impact of dumping heavily subsidised goods on the global market.

Financing critical minerals is challenging as criticality does not make a market, but instead highlights a market failure.

Investing in critical minerals carries additional risk to existing mining risk, often including technological risk as novel extractive and processing techniques are required for non-commoditised critical minerals where there is limited expertise and know-how.

Geopolitical risks, such as price manipulation and export restrictions, lead to market volatility which further deters investors. Jurisdictional risk adds another layer of complexity: critical minerals are typically, but not always, abundant in volatile and conflict-prone regions where corruption is an issue.

While there is also an abundance of some critical minerals in jurisdictions generally considered low risk by miners and investors alike, they all face different issues. For example, permitting a mine in the US is challenging due to community opposition and litigation: according to S&P, it takes an average of nearly 29 years to build a new mine in the US, the second-longest in the world behind only Zambia.

Australia faces high infrastructure and labour costs, factors which drive up capex and opex far above competitor nations across Africa and Latin America. Despite significant exploration, Canada has failed to see more than five new critical minerals mines being brought online in the past 20 years, while Europe faces stalwart green opposition to often politicised projects.

In response to the ongoing global challenges, the US-led Minerals Security Partnership has recently announced the formation of the Finance Network. The network aims to strengthen cooperation and promote information exchange and co-financing among participating institutions to advance diverse, secure, and sustainable supply chains for critical minerals. Participating institutions represent like-minded nations including Australia, Canada, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, Norway, South Korea, Sweden, the United Kingdom, United States. Both the European Bank for Reconstruction and Development and the Africa Finance Corporation are also part of the network.

It is unclear whether the Finance Network will pool funds and mutually select critical minerals projects.

The network does however need the international finance sector’s buy-in.

Specialist mining finance has eroded. UK Mining Specialist Funds demonstrated a decline from about $40 billion in 2010 to about $12 billion in 2022, and Canadian Mining Specialist Funds experienced a drop from circa-$16 billion to c$2.8 billion. This gap has not been plugged by green finance or commercial banks which still view critical minerals as too high-risk, or simply too small to meet investment thresholds, and often both.

Non-commoditised critical minerals also face low rates of return on investments in comparison to tech and other sectors offering much faster and more appealing returns. Price volatility can quickly render projects in Western jurisdictions unfeasible. When that happens some projects fail while others are often bought out by Chinese companies which bring them online once prices rise, and sometimes after efficiencies and new processes are introduced.

This is less likely to continue occurring under various investment and acquisition restrictions in Australia, Canada and the US.

Attracting finance into critical minerals will require the stabilisation of often immature and small markets by creating predictable downstream demand to restore investors’ confidence and boost returns on investment.

If like-minded nations are serious about creating a genuinely diversified supply chain, tax breaks will be required to incentivise institutional and private investors in the meantime to bridge the gap between the lack of commercial viability and the strategic necessity to diversify. Public investments in critical minerals projects will however need to be more targeted and occur in tandem with re-industrialisation. Investing taxpayer dollars in projects that will not feed into downstream industries within like-minded nations are likely to either help to feed China’s manufacturing sector, or create oversupply if sufficient demand doesn’t exist, further lowering prices below commercial viability.

The CMAA Australia is actively bringing its members, governments and the wider finance community to address the challenges of financing critical minerals projects.

Join us at IMARC for an insightful Alternative Pricing Mechanisms session with global critical minerals experts.

Source

This post appeared first on investingnews.com
Previous Post

Supply Chain Disrupted as US East and Gulf Coast Ports Face Worker Strike

Next Post

Rep. Jim Jordan angles to lead a possible House Republican minority

Next Post
Rep. Jim Jordan angles to lead a possible House Republican minority

Rep. Jim Jordan angles to lead a possible House Republican minority

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest

    Hacker lexicon: What is a supply chain attack?

    June 11, 2021

    Losing Depop to US ownership makes the British tech sector look secondhand

    June 11, 2021

    Andrew Lloyd Webber to sue the Government if theatres are not fully reopened from June 21

    June 11, 2021

    Microsoft’s Kate Crawford: ‘AI is neither artificial nor intelligent’

    June 11, 2021
    Maritime Resources: A Low-risk Path to Gold Production in One of the World’s Top Mining Jurisdictions

    Maritime Resources: A Low-risk Path to Gold Production in One of the World’s Top Mining Jurisdictions

    0

    Reply to “Reply to Whitehead” by Desvousges, Mathews and Train: (4) My treatment of the weighted WTP is biased in favor of the DMT (2015) result/conclusion

    0

    The 40 Weirdest (And Best) Charts We Made In This Long, Strange Year

    0

    Will The Debate Over $2,000 Stimulus Checks Help Democrats In Georgia?

    0
    Maritime Resources: A Low-risk Path to Gold Production in One of the World’s Top Mining Jurisdictions

    Maritime Resources: A Low-risk Path to Gold Production in One of the World’s Top Mining Jurisdictions

    July 10, 2025
    OpenAI to release web browser in challenge to Google Chrome

    OpenAI to release web browser in challenge to Google Chrome

    July 10, 2025
    Sports executive charged with bid-rigging in Texas arena project

    Sports executive charged with bid-rigging in Texas arena project

    July 10, 2025
    BHP Faces AU$1.3 Billion Wage Adjustment for Queensland Coal Miners

    BHP Faces AU$1.3 Billion Wage Adjustment for Queensland Coal Miners

    July 10, 2025

    Recent News

    Maritime Resources: A Low-risk Path to Gold Production in One of the World’s Top Mining Jurisdictions

    Maritime Resources: A Low-risk Path to Gold Production in One of the World’s Top Mining Jurisdictions

    July 10, 2025
    OpenAI to release web browser in challenge to Google Chrome

    OpenAI to release web browser in challenge to Google Chrome

    July 10, 2025
    Sports executive charged with bid-rigging in Texas arena project

    Sports executive charged with bid-rigging in Texas arena project

    July 10, 2025
    BHP Faces AU$1.3 Billion Wage Adjustment for Queensland Coal Miners

    BHP Faces AU$1.3 Billion Wage Adjustment for Queensland Coal Miners

    July 10, 2025

    Disclaimer: GlobalTrendsToday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 globaltrendstoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Stock
    • Editor’s Pick

    Copyright © 2025 globaltrendstoday.com | All Rights Reserved