Global Trends Today
  • News
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
No Result
View All Result
  • News
  • Economy
  • Investing
  • Stock
  • Editor’s Pick
No Result
View All Result
Global Trends Today
No Result
View All Result
Home News

Harris flubs manufacturing jobs claim in MSNBC interview

by
September 26, 2024
in News
0
Harris flubs manufacturing jobs claim in MSNBC interview
0
SHARES
2
VIEWS
Share on FacebookShare on Twitter

“All told, almost 200,000 manufacturing jobs were lost during his presidency, starting before the pandemic hit, making Trump one of the biggest losers ever on manufacturing.”

— Vice President Kamala Harris, in an economic speech in Pittsburgh, Sept. 25

“Even before the pandemic, he lost manufacturing jobs, by most people’s estimates at least 200,000.”

— Harris, a few hours later in an interview with MSNBC

This is a good example of how a cleverly phrased line in a speech can get bungled when a politician tries to repeat it later off the cuff.

In the speech, Harris’s phrasing was defensible. But the wording in the interview was wrong.

The Facts

Donald Trump’s economic record before the pandemic was pretty good, with steady growth in overall jobs. But in 2019, the year before the pandemic, manufacturing went into a mild recession, and the number of manufacturing jobs fell nearly 50,000 from January 2019 to February 2020.

While president, Trump never acknowledged this dip and instead kept insisting manufacturing was on an upswing. From February 2017, the first month of jobs data in his presidency, to the time the pandemic struck in March 2020, manufacturing jobs increased about 400,000, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics — though Trump kept rounding up to 500,000 even as jobs were shedding.

The Harris campaign clearly wanted to signal that the manufacturing sector was troubled under Trump before the pandemic struck. So her speech took a figure for total manufacturing jobs losses “during his presidency” — nearly 200,000, after the pandemic — and inserted the phrase “starting before the pandemic hit.”

That’s correct, as phrased.

In the interview, however, Harris dropped the caveats and simply said: “Even before the pandemic, he lost manufacturing jobs, by most people’s estimates at least 200,000.”

That’s wrong. As we noted, before the pandemic Trump could claim a gain of 400,000 manufacturing jobs.

During the Biden-Harris administration, manufacturing jobs have increased more than 700,000. But notably, manufacturing growth has been flat since November 2022 — almost two years. Moreover, many of the manufacturing jobs created under Biden were a rebound from the pandemic. Total manufacturing jobs have increased only about 100,000 above the high point reached under Trump in January 2019.

Asked about her statement in the interview, the Harris campaign pointed to her speech text.

Another dubious claim in the MSNBC interview

“I am not mad at anyone for achieving success, but everyone should pay their fair share. And it is not right that the teachers and the firefighters that I meet every day across our country are paying a higher tax than the richest people in our country.”

This is a two-Pinocchio claim.

Harris is referring to a 2021 White House study that concluded that the 400 wealthiest taxpayers paid an effective tax rate of 8 percent. But that estimate included unrealized gains in the income calculation. That’s not how the tax laws work. People are taxed on capital gains when they sell their stocks or other assets. So this is only a figure for a hypothetical tax system.

According to IRS data on the top 0.001 percent — 1,475 taxpayers with at least $77 million in adjusted gross income in 2020 — the average tax rate was 23.7 percent. The top 1 percent of taxpayers (income of at least $548,000) paid nearly 26 percent.

As for less-wealthy Americans, few, such as teachers or firefighters, pay even the lowest rate of 10 percent because of deductions, exemptions and the like.

According to the Tax Policy Center, about 60 percent of all tax returns are filed by those with income under $50,000 — and about half of those pay no income tax at all; 22 percent paid an effective tax rate of less than 5 percent, and another 22 percent paid less than 10 percent.

Among taxpayers with income between $50,000 and $100,000, about 60 percent paid an effective tax rate below 10 percent.

(About our rating scale)

Send us facts to check by filling out this form

Sign up for The Fact Checker weekly newsletter

The Fact Checker is a verified signatory to the International Fact-Checking Network code of principles

This post appeared first on washingtonpost.com
Previous Post

GOP congressman posts, then deletes, racist comments about Haitians

Next Post

Odessa Minerals Limited (ASX: ODE) – Trading Halt

Next Post
Odessa Minerals Limited (ASX: ODE) – Trading Halt

Odessa Minerals Limited (ASX: ODE) – Trading Halt

    Become a VIP member by signing up for our newsletter. Enjoy exclusive content, early access to sales, and special offers just for you! As a VIP, you'll receive personalized updates, loyalty rewards, and invitations to private events. Elevate your experience and join our exclusive community today!


    By opting in you agree to receive emails from us and our affiliates. Your information is secure and your privacy is protected.

    • Trending
    • Comments
    • Latest

    Hacker lexicon: What is a supply chain attack?

    June 11, 2021

    Losing Depop to US ownership makes the British tech sector look secondhand

    June 11, 2021

    Andrew Lloyd Webber to sue the Government if theatres are not fully reopened from June 21

    June 11, 2021

    Microsoft’s Kate Crawford: ‘AI is neither artificial nor intelligent’

    June 11, 2021
    Brunswick Exploration Has Now Identified Four Major New Dykes in 2025 at Mirage

    Brunswick Exploration Has Now Identified Four Major New Dykes in 2025 at Mirage

    0

    Reply to “Reply to Whitehead” by Desvousges, Mathews and Train: (4) My treatment of the weighted WTP is biased in favor of the DMT (2015) result/conclusion

    0

    The 40 Weirdest (And Best) Charts We Made In This Long, Strange Year

    0

    Will The Debate Over $2,000 Stimulus Checks Help Democrats In Georgia?

    0
    Brunswick Exploration Has Now Identified Four Major New Dykes in 2025 at Mirage

    Brunswick Exploration Has Now Identified Four Major New Dykes in 2025 at Mirage

    July 9, 2025
    Boeing delivers most airplanes since late 2023 after ramping up 737 Max output

    Boeing delivers most airplanes since late 2023 after ramping up 737 Max output

    July 9, 2025
    Share Purchase Plan Offer Booklet

    Share Purchase Plan Offer Booklet

    July 9, 2025
    High Grade Cu-Au at Surface Delivers New Targets at Mankayan

    High Grade Cu-Au at Surface Delivers New Targets at Mankayan

    July 9, 2025

    Recent News

    Brunswick Exploration Has Now Identified Four Major New Dykes in 2025 at Mirage

    Brunswick Exploration Has Now Identified Four Major New Dykes in 2025 at Mirage

    July 9, 2025
    Boeing delivers most airplanes since late 2023 after ramping up 737 Max output

    Boeing delivers most airplanes since late 2023 after ramping up 737 Max output

    July 9, 2025
    Share Purchase Plan Offer Booklet

    Share Purchase Plan Offer Booklet

    July 9, 2025
    High Grade Cu-Au at Surface Delivers New Targets at Mankayan

    High Grade Cu-Au at Surface Delivers New Targets at Mankayan

    July 9, 2025

    Disclaimer: GlobalTrendsToday.com, its managers, its employees, and assigns (collectively "The Company") do not make any guarantee or warranty about what is advertised above. Information provided by this website is for research purposes only and should not be considered as personalized financial advice. The Company is not affiliated with, nor does it receive compensation from, any specific security. The Company is not registered or licensed by any governing body in any jurisdiction to give investing advice or provide investment recommendation. Any investments recommended here should be taken into consideration only after consulting with your investment advisor and after reviewing the prospectus or financial statements of the company.

    • About us
    • Contacts
    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms & Conditions

    Copyright © 2025 globaltrendstoday.com | All Rights Reserved

    No Result
    View All Result
    • News
    • Economy
    • Investing
    • Stock
    • Editor’s Pick

    Copyright © 2025 globaltrendstoday.com | All Rights Reserved